VS: Ringo Sucks

Kovalainen Antti (Antti.Kovalainen@hke.fi)
Tue, 18 Mar 1997 09:00:29 +0200


Maybe you guys should take this out to the Beatles mailinglist ? I
don't want to seem strict, but this isn't about acid jazz anymore... and
oh, Ringo _does_ suck.

>----------
>L=E4hett=E4j=E4: datboy[SMTP:datboy@i84.net]
>L=E4hetetty: 17. maaliskuuta 1997 20:46
>Vastaanottaja: acid-jazz@ucsd.edu
>Aihe: Re: Ringo Sucks
>
>DJ Lo-Ki wrote:
>
>> Sorry to burst your bubble, but the "myth" is true, if you heard good
>> drumming on the beatles albums, that was because Paul used to sneak =
into
>> the studio after hours to re-record the drum tracks, and un-do the
>> damage Ringo caused. Ringo was chosen for his presence and star =
quality,
>> but his drumming always sucked.
>>=20
>> -Lo-Ki
>
>and I say
>
>sorry to burst YOUR bubble but you're fulla shit.
>
>His drumming inspired a lot of other folks, and that's good enough for
>me. It's just off enough to make it cool. Paul's drumming might be
>more exact but that doesn't make either one of them any greater or
>better.
>
>If you think he was so bad, by all means please step up on to the stage
>and make that sound better than he can. (The only person I ever heard
>that could come close was Robert Wyatt).
>