Re: 1999 LIST POLL


Mark Turner (nugroove@pacbell.net)
Mon, 06 Dec 1999 14:23:38 -0800



At 10:48 AM 12/6/99 -0800, you wrote:
>
>
>Michael Aregood wrote:
>>
>> I don't see any reason to have different poll categories for these two time
>> periods, so to avoid confusion in the mind of the pollee, the 1999 poll
will
>> consist of the same categories as the decade poll (see below).
>>
>> Please submit 1999 entries to: maregood@comcastpc.com by January 4, 2000.
>
>
>Fine with me. I did forget, though to include "Best House track of the
decade"
>so maybe you could have the same for your yearly poll. I'll post a revised
poll
>to make things easier...I only got one entry so far.
>
>Elson
>

Well it's going to take a certain amount of reflection before I'm ready to
vote in either poll. But I'd like to say that I like the idea of
consolidating the categories, and that I like the categories Elson came up
with much better than the ones we've been using previously. They're much
clearer!

Would it make sense to have a "nominating period" so we can whittle down
the entries to a reasonable number of nominees? The last few years it
seems like we've wound up with a whole bunch of one-vote nominees and the
winners which only get a half-dozen votes...

 
________________________________________
Mark Turner
nugroove@pacbell.net <-- "nu" address

Hear "Jazzadelica" with Rocky Rococo
Sundays from 10pm-2am on KFJC, 89.7 FM
________________________________________



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Dec 06 1999 - 23:28:14 MET