Re: Moby (was Re: FUTURE STATE OF ACID-JAZZ)

From: Steve Oldmeadow (soldmeadow@bigpond.com)
Date: Thu Jun 01 2000 - 00:27:31 MET DST

  • Next message: stephanie: "detroit last weekend review (not by me, don't worry)"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Erik Gaderlund <erikg@macconnect.com>
    To: <acid-jazz@ucsd.edu>
    Sent: 31/05/2000 16:37
    Subject: Fwd: Moby (was Re: FUTURE STATE OF ACID-JAZZ)

    > Interesting that he ducked it then. The story about the vocals was
    > that Moby was at a friends house listening to them (They're the Lomax
    > Recordings, mad by a father and sun earlier this Century--they just
    > went out into the fields and hit record. I had been listening to
    > 'Run On' for a while (has a rather wacky video, track down the
    > "Circuit (3)" DVD to view,) when my Dad had the originals in the CD
    > changer in his car--gave my brother and I a double take.) and though
    > they needed a beat, but, mostly like the 'soul' of them. And, if you
    > read the linernotes of the album he does credit them, so not sure
    > where the reporter got his info.
    >

    Could the issue have been whether the songwriters/performers (or their
    estate) were paid? I don't remember the reporter actually mentioning money
    but that may have been his point. Then again I'm sure Deep Forest, Sacred
    Spirit, Enigma, Delerium and hundreds of cheesy trance artists never paid
    their procured "vocalists" so Moby may have just been following the
    precedent.

    Steve



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 01 2000 - 00:36:26 MET DST