Greetings / back on the groove

From: Francesco (jazz74@infinito.it)
Date: Tue Dec 04 2001 - 12:43:28 CET

  • Next message: Tekin Suleyman: "paul jackson suspect attachments"

    Not so far we talked about deep house, trying to define it: I guess finally
    we said that it's very difficoult to define new genders becuse they are so
    contaminated and "crossovered".
    So people like aj sure look at those contamination, aj itself is a
    contamination.
    And i think this list is really open to everithing coming from, going to or
    walking with groove and jazz.
    Of course we have to update artists list and music genders, we can't talk
    about only JTQ or Izit or other very classic aj.
    I also think deep house and others "dance" jazz-groove genders are creating
    new interest around aj. And that's good.
    Then keep on talking about and sharing great music

    Francesco

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Ar C" <hkshadow@hotmail.com>
    To: <chairmancal@atomicattack.com>; <brunello@tin.it>; <acid-jazz@ucsd.edu>
    Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:29 AM
    Subject: Re: Greetings / back on the groove

    > As calvin jsut said :
    > back on the groove.
    > Just to say that I still get excited by "acid-jazz" style music, but
    excpet
    > for some good broken beat stuffs (esp. the latest domu album . the
    4hero...)
    > I start to listen to more and more fringe music such as Simian and all
    > Source artists or Fug.
    > I am not sure if this is the list to discuss these artists... Is there
    > another list i should subscibe too
    > That's it / Oh l'amour
    > ArC
    >
    >
    > >From: Calvin Ho <chairmancal@atomicattack.com>
    > >To: brunello <brunello@tin.it>, <acid-jazz@ucsd.edu>
    > >Subject: Re: Greetings
    > >Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 00:33:30 +0800
    > >
    > >To Brunello and others on the AJ list, :)
    > >
    > >Sorry for Brunello for taking offense, it was not intentional from my
    side.
    > >I hope you stay on the list. There are always problems with how people
    > >interpret emails. People usually read it without that 'happy tone"
    because
    > >it is in black and white and we don't know each other all too well. :)
    > >
    > >To be specific, I think we all pretend to be professional (me as well)
    and
    > >try and deny that we all have some closet pop loves that we try and hide.
    I
    > >don't consider myself ever knowledgeable enough. I often read mails and
    > >think" gosh they know so much about such and such" Btw, for the record(no
    > >pun intended), I love Erasure (AAAHHH!!!), and I don't really care what
    > >people think. They are great, but I know it won't go down too well on
    this
    > >list. But I don't care cos it's personal. I still go on Ebay and look for
    > >their rare stuff and my heart feels with joy when I can track down their
    > >records I have been looking for in the last 10 years... :)
    > >
    > >I have read many semi-negative emails on this list for the last few days
    > >and
    > >it isn't too good. I only got two feedbacks from my last email about AJ
    and
    > >just want to give thanks to Paula45 for an understanding reply and for
    > >Brunello for trying to clear himself up. It's just funny that if people
    > >don't respond, we take it as rejection, and replies that are personal
    > >become
    > >that too. :)
    > >
    > >I just hope we all know that we are here because we respect and love each
    > >other because of what we share and learn in in music. Let's get back on
    the
    > >groove shall we? :)
    > >
    > >Calvin. :p
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Dec 04 2001 - 13:01:02 CET