Re: 4Hero's 'Les Fleur' / no co-production...

From: Mark Allerton (Mark@warmspot.cix.co.uk)
Date: Thu Dec 13 2001 - 01:44:23 CET

  • Next message: eric kitel: "Re: MING"

    There are some problems with the "these tracks are not to be fucked
    with" argument when it comes to 4Hero - firstly that 4Hero's
    version of Naima, while respectful of the original, is nothing like
    Coltrane's, and secondly that Dego did a substantially more modern
    sounding version of "2000 Black" under one of his other aliases.
    There's that whole last four minutes of the Nuyorican soul remix
    too.

    I'm definitely a bit torn over 4Hero's cover versions (can't you
    tell?) - I think I'm with Elson when it comes to thinking that the
    "Black Gold" remix was about as perfect an example of a "good"
    cover version as you'll come across, in that it had the flavour of
    the original but did something new with it, and overall I'd be
    happier if all of 4Hero's covers were like that. But "Les Fleur" is
    certainly not the first time they've been that conservative in a
    cover.

    On Wednesday, December 12, 2001, at 11:25 AM, Aaron Shinn wrote:

    > In order to appreciate the Les Fleur cover, you have to understand
    > the level of respect that these cats have for people like Charles
    > Stepney and Roy Ayers. These classic tracks are a little holy -
    > not to be fucked with. So I'd really prefer to look at Les Fleur
    > as an homage, not a remix. It's lovingly done as well - if you dig
    > the original, the cover is bound to please.
    >
    > Hell, even look at 4Hero's Naima from last year, similar approach
    > with less involved production.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 13 2001 - 02:10:03 CET