Re: Negative music.../ Positive Solutions

From: Steven Catanzaro (stevencatanzaro@sprintmail.com)
Date: Thu May 30 2002 - 07:36:55 CEST

  • Next message: nethed: "[acid-jazz] Eklektika in London/Festivals"

    > that ashanti outsold tweet and celine is amazing
    > and not that i think the other two are so great
    > her debut just really showed me something about the average music listener

    Hey but Lynne, what does it tell ya, other than that the average music
    listener doesn't care much for the technical art of singing. Nothing new in
    that. If records were judged by the technical skill of the singer, where
    would Bob Dylan be? Where would Billie Holiday be? As far as lyrics, I don't
    think Tweet or Celine are making Joni Mitchell stay up late sweating her
    next turn of phrase.

    > do you really call what she is doing singing?
    > can so do what whitney, jill, or mary can do?
    > the girl's success rides off of her connection to ja rule and his camp..

    But people can, and did, say the same exact thing about Janet Jackson when
    she started making records, even back before Control. I bet we both know
    MANY singers who could've rocked "Let's Wait A While" or "What Have You Done
    For Me Lately" but Janet's the one. Yet who hates Janet now? If anyone does,
    she's got 80 million ways to refute their opinions...

    As for staying power. I distinctly remember the buzz around Cindy Lauper and
    Madonna, back in about '85. Madonna was using sex to sell, while Cindy
    Lauper was a "serious" artist who had her song covered by Miles Davis. All
    the "smart money" was on Madonna to be a one hit wonder and Lauper to ascend
    to the heights.

    So much for the smart money.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu May 30 2002 - 07:48:17 CEST