Re: [acid-jazz] headphones......

From: Rel (rel@san.rr.com)
Date: Fri Sep 27 2002 - 20:15:56 CEST

  • Next message: _dakati _: "Re: [acid-jazz] headphones......"

    Somewhere on the internet...

    [11:02] <Lush> whats the link to those headphones again?
    [11:05] <KillerMonk> meow
    [11:06] <KillerMonk> !:)
    [11:06] <Lush> meow shmeh
    [11:06] <Lush> shmeh
    [11:07] <azazel> they're sennheiser HD-590s
    [11:07] <azazel> if you're in themarket for good headphones, get 'em
    [11:08] <azazel> I promise thorough satisfaction
    [11:08] <azazel> you can take a 30 mile trip up the 5 and listen to them for
    yourself =)
    [11:09] <azazel> I got them for $150, you shouldn't have trouble finding
    them for that price, or by this time, perhaps a little bit less
    [11:09] <Lush> whats the url yo
    [11:12] <azazel> one moment
    [11:12] <KillerMonk> :()
    [11:12] <KillerMonk> $150 us = $260 cad =(
    [11:12] * KillerMonk cries
    [11:12] <Lush> thats a lot of money eh?
    [11:12] <azazel>
    http://www.sennheiserusa.com/pages/products/headphones/590.htm
    [11:13] <Lush> thanks
    [11:13] <azazel> http://buy.sennheiserusa.com/ASP/Sennheiser/pdf/hd590.pdf
    [11:13] <KillerMonk> those are a nice looking headphoen
    [11:14] <azazel> they feel even better
    [11:14] <azazel> they're so comfortable
    [11:14] <KillerMonk> cool
    [11:14] <azazel> the material is sweet

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "steph99" <beleza@speakeasy.net>
    To: "Mark Allerton" <mark@warmspot.compulink.co.uk>
    Cc: <acid-jazz@ucsd.edu>
    Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:18 AM
    Subject: Re: [acid-jazz] headphones......

    > Yeah, but there's a reason Sennheisers have all replaceable parts
    (although I'm
    > not familiar with this model in particular)...they all promptly break if
    you're
    > presumtuous enough to use them!
    >
    > On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Mark Allerton wrote:
    >
    > > One of the great things about the Sennheiser HD25 models is that they
    > > are (in theory) totally serviceable. This is one of the reasons they
    > > look so low-tech (they really do look like something out of the 50s or
    > > 60s.) The Sony 700 looks terrific, which I think is one reason they are
    > > so popular, but it seems to be their downfall too.
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 20:16:03 CEST