Re: Napster

From: Olaf Molenveld (olaf@interactivelink.nl)
Date: Sat Mar 31 2001 - 16:39:45 CEST

  • Next message: Olaf Molenveld: "Re: vinyl vs. CD again"

    mmm..just thinking about all these "big" bands signed to the big
    recordcompanies are tied with hands and feet to those companies..they get
    all these advantages in money, and they have to pay back by releasing
    several albums and touring and promoting etc. i guess when their
    recordcompany is telling them the payback isn't working very well and using
    napster as an argument for less sales these "big" bands are getting a little
    pissed of at Napster..but the reality is/was that the big recordcompanies
    where pushing these bands through the throaths of the common audience using
    their recordstores and promotion-campaigns...but now these days are over...

    Olaf

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Jason Martin <suenomartino@bigpond.com>
    To: <acid-jazz@ucsd.edu>
    Sent: zaterdag 31 maart 2001 3:16
    Subject: Re: Napster

    > the facts are:
    >
    > *everyone copied music before napster, but now people can be more
    selective
    > about what they do get to copy, and can hook up with others who have same
    > tastes as them
    >
    > *it is only Mp3 and any audiophile knows that mp3 is severely compressed
    and
    > totally lacks any sound quality found on original cd recordings and _any_
    > vinyl recording full stop (but this doesnt make any real difference for
    > 'pop' listeners or minidisc users since these are majorly compressed
    anyway)
    >
    > *if the music is comercially accessible and the listener really loves it,
    > they'll buy the original 95% of the time. After all, materialism is what
    its
    > all about :) (metallica dont fall in to this 'really love it' catagory,
    > hence the reason they stress.. ;)
    >
    > *"real" artists want their share no doubt, but im sure most genuine
    artists
    > are happy to see their music getting more exposure either way -> im
    thinking
    > less commercial artists along the lines of what people here listen to.
    >
    > i think it is a great resource for any music lover for the simple fact
    that
    > you _do_ have access to all that music which is locally unavailable or
    > totally rare and not currently reissued.. the argument for me is that the
    > majors are shooting themselves in the foot, because for every "napster"
    they
    > try to shut down, 10 others will spring up in its midst..
    >
    >
    > martino
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Mar 31 2001 - 17:07:59 CEST