"Bethany A. Johnson" wrote:
> Maybe we should consider returning to the convention of placing "OT" in
> the subject line when we are not discussing what the list is normally
> intended for. While I enjoyed reading some of the accounts and
> discussions last week, I would really like to have the option to skip
> out on such things as the financial advice below.
Yes and no. We should use "OT" to mark a message when it might be off
topic.
However, if something is off topic then it probably doesn't belong to
this list.
Let's focus on AJ (with our usual loose definition) here.
This means, no wtc posts.
- erikb
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 17 2001 - 18:50:37 CEST