From: claudio . (kloud_eyo_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 2003-02-28 22:17:22
....alright so they were dresses
what's the logic behind a dress vs. pants anyway? as in why were men
'supposed' to wear pants and women skirts? anybody? now, i'm not looking for
neither a shovinistic nor a feminist reply, just plain history....
....this is kinda relevant to the list...i....guess...:)
>From: Peter Nicholson <bournik_at_svn.net>
>To: "claudio ." <kloud_eyo_at_hotmail.com>
>CC: acid-jazz_at_ucsd.edu
>Subject: Re: [acid-jazz] Re:[acid jazz] Koop Tour in North America (Los
>Angeles)
>Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:03:38 -0800
>
>i am sooooo disappointed they won't be wearing those fabulous dresses (i
>heard from palm that they were in fact dresses, and vintage ones at that.)
>i guess i'll go anyhoo.
>-pn
>
>claudio . wrote:
>
>>
>>whaat those 'dresses' were pretty cool, besides they're not really dresses
>>- kinda like really long shirts.
>>...style yo...
>>
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail