Re: Napster

From: Joni . (bigorangecat@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 16:29:49 CEST

  • Next message: Franco Monti: "RE: DJ Preference"

    I don't think that mp3 quality is *all that* great. CD's and vinyl are
    definately better quality. I'm also on a tight budget, so it gives me more
    buying confidence because I have some idea of what I'm getting. I think the
    feature of browsing others files also help the proliferation of the music
    because, if someone has alot of titles I'm farmiliar w/ I may sample
    something else in their library that I've never heard of. Another really
    cool thing about napster is to use it to find songs that you might have
    never heard again. i.e. muppets - manamana, my little pony, conan the
    barbarian cartoon themes ;)

    >From: "B. Young" <bjy07@hotmail.com>
    >To: acid-jazz@ucsd.edu
    >Subject: Re: Napster
    >Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 05:05:32 -0800
    >
    >I too have felt guilty at times for using Napster. I think I personally
    >made a mistake some months ago when I shared a lot of the vinyl that I had
    >recorded onto my computer for my cd's. I got all these people downloading
    >dope ass 12"s and spreading them all over Napster (I didn't let it go on
    >too
    >long, but a good dozen or so bomb ass vinyl only tracks got away for free).
    >I know for a fact these songs weren't on Napster previously because I'd
    >been
    >searching for them before I bought them and when I see them now, its the
    >same track length. I think it would have been ok had the songs been only 2
    >or 3 minute samples. Now, I am selective about what 12"s I share and often
    >will only put a few minutes of the track.
    >
    >Sometimes I wonder if people really do buy the stuff they download. I've
    >downloaded a few hundred songs over the last year or so and most of it has
    >been stuff that I cant find (old/rare dance music, rare jazz, funk, and
    >soul, and also cd's I'd lost over the years). I am currently keeping an
    >eye
    >out for the majority of the mp3's I have and can honestly say that I buy
    >plenty of music. Enough of making myself feel like it's ok. My thing is, I
    >know how people are, and know people who don't buy shit and download and
    >make loads of cd's. And i know a lot of people who don't have a computer,
    >but if they did, wouldn't hesitate to download everything they could. And
    >I
    >dont think that's an assault on their character, its like damn... if
    >somebody is passing out free cd's of your favorite artists are you going to
    >take them? It is true that anybody who is deeply serious about their music
    >WILL buy the music and give back to the artists, however, think about this
    >(it's been said a thousand times)... When you buy a cd for 13 to 16 dollars
    >and up, how much of that actually goes to the artist you want to support?
    >From what I hear, very little. Maybe a dollar at most. And the rest??? I
    >hate to think about it. Is this different for smaller labels? Do they get
    >all that money. For example if I buy a cd from Delsin for example, do the
    >owners and artist get most of the money after the record store takes its
    >cut?
    >
    >Later,
    >Beau.
    >
    >
    >>From: "Dave Haynes" <gvcontact@hotmail.com>
    >>To: acid-jazz@ucsd.edu
    >>Subject: Napster
    >>Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:57:24 -0000
    >>
    >>I was wondering what everybody's views were on Napster. I have been using
    >>it
    >>for several months. I fell a bit guilty about it because I know I'm
    >>ripping
    >>off other people copyright. It is so useful though. If someone mentions a
    >>tune on the list that I haven't checked out, I can just pop onto Napster,
    >>download it and give it a listen. Then I can also see what else that
    >>artist
    >>has done. Although not everything is on there especially vinyl only
    >>releases
    >>- I can get most of the stuf that I want.
    >>
    >>The thing is though that lots of people are vehemntly against this. But
    >>from
    >>my own personal experience Napster allows me to preview tracks I may never
    >>have heard of. I may not pay for it then but I'd say about 70% of the time
    >>I
    >>then go onto buy the track on vinyl cos I want to play it out. I'll also
    >>go
    >>and buy more stuff from that artist which I may never have even been aware
    >>of before.
    >>
    >>I'm actually doing a research project on the whole area of digital music
    >>and
    >>was wondering what sort of views the acid jazz community had ont the
    >>subject.
    >>
    >>How many people are using? How many are against?
    >>How many artists on this list mind that there stuff could be getting
    >>downloaded without royalties being paid?
    >>
    >>Any thoughts?
    >>_________________________________________________________________________
    >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
    >>
    >
    >_________________________________________________________________
    >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
    >

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Mar 30 2001 - 16:59:31 CEST